Legal System Under Fire

Staff Writer
Contributor
Posted by Staff WriterJuly 21, 2006 10:03 AM

This week, the Association of Trial Attorneys of America voted to change their name. This organization, of which I am a member, adopted the new name of the American Association for Justice. This change of the name is not merely some public relations ploy, but is an attempt to reflect what our purpose is. For more than two hundred years, justice has been provided through the American judicial system; and the cornerstone of that system has been the jury system. But recently, our system has come under fire.

Insurance companies, big business, and special interest groups have determined that the American Citizen is no longer competent to render justice. They want to eliminate jury trials, or in the alternative limit the discretion of the jurors with inadequate caps. Many of the arguments used are similar to arguments that were used in the 1600's and 1700's when the idea of democracy was budding in Europe and later in the Western Hemisphere. The argument used by the monarchies was that the average citizen lacked the intellectual capacity to determine through elections their representatives. Only royalty and the "intelligentsia" were capable of such duties. We later heard this same arguments when minorities and woman fought for their right to vote. Now we hear that the American Citizen lacks the intellect or sophistication to render fair verdicts; and that American tends to fall prey to their emotions. Those arguments ring as hollow today as they did centuries ago. It is an insult to every citizen of this great country.

As a trial lawyer, and as a citizen, I feel it is my duty to fight to save our great legal system. I am proud to be a part of an organization that strives for justice. Citizen participation is an essential part of our legal system; more importantly, citizen participation is essential for justice!

1 Comment

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Jeff
Posted by Jeff
February 08, 2007 10:18 AM

There are many areas of the law where I would not feel competent to render a verdict. Intellectual property and medical malpractice are but two examples. It seems to me you would end up with better verdicts and fairer outcomes with specialized courts and juries trained in the area under consideration.

If we're going to allow people to make far reaching decisions in which they have no expertise, why stop there? Why have the AMA and ABA restricting who can practice law and medicine?

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Richmond

InjuryBoard Richmond RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Richmond is brought to you by Butler, Williams & Skilling

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Butler, Williams & Skilling 1-866-735-1102 Ext. 375 www.butlerwilliams.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Richmond, Fredericksburg, Mechanicsville, Hampton, Newport News, Tuckahoe, Cumberland, White Stone Beach, King George, Louisa, All Surrounding Areas
100 Shockoe SlipFourth Floor, Richmond, Virginia 23219 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address